[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27e56f61-3267-de50-0d49-5fcfc59af93c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:35:42 +0300
From: Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@...le.com>,
Ivan Delalande <colona@...sta.com>,
Priyaranjan Jha <priyarjha@...gle.com>,
Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFCv3 05/15] tcp: authopt: Add crypto initialization
On 25.08.2021 02:34, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On 8/24/21 2:34 PM, Leonard Crestez wrote:
>> The crypto_shash API is used in order to compute packet signatures. The
>> API comes with several unfortunate limitations:
>>
>> 1) Allocating a crypto_shash can sleep and must be done in user context.
>> 2) Packet signatures must be computed in softirq context
>> 3) Packet signatures use dynamic "traffic keys" which require exclusive
>> access to crypto_shash for crypto_setkey.
>>
>> The solution is to allocate one crypto_shash for each possible cpu for
>> each algorithm at setsockopt time. The per-cpu tfm is then borrowed from
>> softirq context, signatures are computed and the tfm is returned.
>>
>
> I could not see the per-cpu stuff that you mention in the changelog.
That's a little embarrasing, I forgot to implement the actual per-cpu
stuff. tcp_authopt_alg_imp.tfm is meant to be an array up to NR_CPUS and
tcp_authopt_alg_get_tfm needs no locking other than preempt_disable
(which should already be the case).
The reference counting would still only happen from very few places:
setsockopt, close and openreq. This would only impact request/response
traffic and relatively little.
Performance was not a major focus so far. Preventing impact on non-AO
connections is important but typical AO usecases are long-lived
low-traffic connections.
--
Regards,
Leonard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists