lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210826191449.utd37kj5xkl762gx@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:44:51 +0530
From:   Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
To:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
CC:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@...com>,
        Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] phy: cdns-dphy: Prepare for Rx support

On 23/08/21 04:25AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Pratyush,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 12:33:41AM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > The Rx programming sequence differs from the Tx programming sequence.
> > Currently only Tx mode is supported. For example, the power on and off,
> > validation, and configuration procedures are all different between Rx
> > and Tx DPHYs. Currently they are only written from a Tx point of view
> > and they won't work with an Rx DPHY. Move them to cdns_dphy_ops so they
> > can be defined by the implementation, accommodating both Rx and Tx mode
> > DPHYs.
> > 
> > The clocks "psm" and "pll_ref" are not used by the Rx path so make them
> > optional in the probe and then check if they exist in the Tx power_on()
> > hook.
> 
> I think it would be better to check them at probe time.

Right. Now that we no longer switch mode dynamically, this can be done.

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Instead of having both Rx and Tx modes in the same driver data, keep
> >   them separate since the op selection is based on compatible now. For
> >   that reason, the cdns_dphy_driver_data struct is no longer needed.
> > - Rename ref_dphy_ops to tx_ref_dphy_ops to clarify their purpose.
> > - Drop submode checks in validate() hook.
> > 
> >  drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c b/drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c
> > index ba042e39cfaf..0a169d649216 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c
> > @@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ struct cdns_dphy;
> >  struct cdns_dphy_ops {
> >  	int (*probe)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy);
> >  	void (*remove)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy);
> > +	int (*power_on)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy);
> > +	int (*power_off)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy);
> > +	int (*validate)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode,
> > +			union phy_configure_opts *opts);
> > +	int (*configure)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, union phy_configure_opts *opts);
> >  	void (*set_psm_div)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, u8 div);
> >  	void (*set_clk_lane_cfg)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy,
> >  				 enum cdns_dphy_clk_lane_cfg cfg);
> > @@ -86,6 +91,7 @@ struct cdns_dphy_ops {
> >  struct cdns_dphy {
> >  	struct cdns_dphy_cfg cfg;
> >  	void __iomem *regs;
> > +	struct device *dev;
> >  	struct clk *psm_clk;
> >  	struct clk *pll_ref_clk;
> >  	const struct cdns_dphy_ops *ops;
> > @@ -199,20 +205,9 @@ static void cdns_dphy_ref_set_psm_div(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, u8 div)
> >  	       dphy->regs + DPHY_PSM_CFG);
> >  }
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * This is the reference implementation of DPHY hooks. Specific integration of
> > - * this IP may have to re-implement some of them depending on how they decided
> > - * to wire things in the SoC.
> > - */
> > -static const struct cdns_dphy_ops ref_dphy_ops = {
> > -	.get_wakeup_time_ns = cdns_dphy_ref_get_wakeup_time_ns,
> > -	.set_pll_cfg = cdns_dphy_ref_set_pll_cfg,
> > -	.set_psm_div = cdns_dphy_ref_set_psm_div,
> > -};
> > -
> > -static int cdns_dphy_config_from_opts(struct phy *phy,
> > -				      struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy *opts,
> > -				      struct cdns_dphy_cfg *cfg)
> > +static int cdns_dphy_tx_config_from_opts(struct phy *phy,
> > +					 struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy *opts,
> > +					 struct cdns_dphy_cfg *cfg)
> >  {
> >  	struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> >  	unsigned int dsi_hfp_ext = 0;
> > @@ -232,24 +227,13 @@ static int cdns_dphy_config_from_opts(struct phy *phy,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int cdns_dphy_validate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode,
> > -			      union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> > +static int cdns_dphy_tx_configure(struct cdns_dphy *dphy,
> > +				  union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> >  {
> >  	struct cdns_dphy_cfg cfg = { 0 };
> > -
> > -	if (mode != PHY_MODE_MIPI_DPHY)
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > -	return cdns_dphy_config_from_opts(phy, &opts->mipi_dphy, &cfg);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int cdns_dphy_configure(struct phy *phy, union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> > -{
> > -	struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > -	struct cdns_dphy_cfg cfg = { 0 };
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > -	ret = cdns_dphy_config_from_opts(phy, &opts->mipi_dphy, &cfg);
> > +	ret = cdns_dphy_tx_config_from_opts(dphy->phy, &opts->mipi_dphy, &cfg);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > @@ -279,9 +263,18 @@ static int cdns_dphy_configure(struct phy *phy, union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int cdns_dphy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> > +static int cdns_dphy_tx_validate(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, enum phy_mode mode,
> > +				 int submode, union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> >  {
> > -	struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > +	struct cdns_dphy_cfg cfg = { 0 };
> > +
> > +	return cdns_dphy_tx_config_from_opts(dphy->phy, &opts->mipi_dphy, &cfg);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int cdns_dphy_tx_power_on(struct cdns_dphy *dphy)
> > +{
> > +	if (!dphy->psm_clk || !dphy->pll_ref_clk)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> >  	clk_prepare_enable(dphy->psm_clk);
> >  	clk_prepare_enable(dphy->pll_ref_clk);
> > @@ -293,16 +286,73 @@ static int cdns_dphy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int cdns_dphy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> > +static int cdns_dphy_tx_power_off(struct cdns_dphy *dphy)
> >  {
> > -	struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > -
> >  	clk_disable_unprepare(dphy->pll_ref_clk);
> >  	clk_disable_unprepare(dphy->psm_clk);
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * This is the reference implementation of DPHY hooks. Specific integration of
> > + * this IP may have to re-implement some of them depending on how they decided
> > + * to wire things in the SoC.
> > + */
> > +static const struct cdns_dphy_ops tx_ref_dphy_ops = {
> > +	.power_on = cdns_dphy_tx_power_on,
> > +	.power_off = cdns_dphy_tx_power_off,
> > +	.validate = cdns_dphy_tx_validate,
> > +	.configure = cdns_dphy_tx_configure,
> > +	.get_wakeup_time_ns = cdns_dphy_ref_get_wakeup_time_ns,
> > +	.set_pll_cfg = cdns_dphy_ref_set_pll_cfg,
> > +	.set_psm_div = cdns_dphy_ref_set_psm_div,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int cdns_dphy_validate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode,
> > +			      union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> > +{
> > +	struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > +
> > +	if (mode != PHY_MODE_MIPI_DPHY)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (dphy->ops->validate)
> > +		return dphy->ops->validate(dphy, mode, submode, opts);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int cdns_dphy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> > +{
> > +	struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > +
> > +	if (dphy->ops->power_on)
> > +		return dphy->ops->power_on(dphy);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int cdns_dphy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> > +{
> > +	struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > +
> > +	if (dphy->ops->power_off)
> > +		return dphy->ops->power_off(dphy);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int cdns_dphy_configure(struct phy *phy, union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> > +{
> > +	struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > +
> > +	if (dphy->ops->configure)
> > +		return dphy->ops->configure(dphy, opts);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> Given that all of these are essentially pass-through operations, how
> about getting rid of the indirection ? I would create a new structure:
> 
> struct cdns_dphy_info {
> 	const struct phy_ops *phy_ops;
> 	const struct cdns_dphy_ops *dphy_ops;
> };
> 
> and reference it in cdns_dphy_of_match. The cdns_dphy structure would
> then store a pointer to cdns_dphy_info. That way you won't have to
> extend cdns_dphy_ops, which could possibly be renamed to
> cdns_dphy_tx_ops as you don't use those operations for rx.

Ok, sounds like a good idea.

> 
> >  static const struct phy_ops cdns_dphy_ops = {
> >  	.configure	= cdns_dphy_configure,
> >  	.validate	= cdns_dphy_validate,
> > @@ -320,6 +370,7 @@ static int cdns_dphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	if (!dphy)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, dphy);
> > +	dphy->dev = &pdev->dev;
> >  
> >  	dphy->ops = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> >  	if (!dphy->ops)
> > @@ -329,11 +380,11 @@ static int cdns_dphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	if (IS_ERR(dphy->regs))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(dphy->regs);
> >  
> > -	dphy->psm_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "psm");
> > +	dphy->psm_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dphy->dev, "psm");
> >  	if (IS_ERR(dphy->psm_clk))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(dphy->psm_clk);
> >  
> > -	dphy->pll_ref_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pll_ref");
> > +	dphy->pll_ref_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dphy->dev, "pll_ref");
> >  	if (IS_ERR(dphy->pll_ref_clk))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(dphy->pll_ref_clk);
> >  
> > @@ -369,7 +420,7 @@ static int cdns_dphy_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  }
> >  
> >  static const struct of_device_id cdns_dphy_of_match[] = {
> > -	{ .compatible = "cdns,dphy", .data = &ref_dphy_ops },
> > +	{ .compatible = "cdns,dphy", .data = &tx_ref_dphy_ops },
> >  	{ /* sentinel */ },
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cdns_dphy_of_match);
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments Inc.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ