lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YSj0Tz8DwstOy4nG@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:18:55 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parport: remove non-zero check on count

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 09:52:07PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 11:07 AM Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >
> > The check for count appears to be incorrect since a non-zero count
> > check occurs a couple of statements earlier. Currently the check is
> > always false and the dev->port->irq != PARPORT_IRQ_NONE part of the
> > check is never tested and the if statement is dead-code. Fix this
> > by removing the check on count.
> >
> > Note that this code is pre-git history, so I can't find a sha for
> > it.
> >
> > Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
> 
> Greg, can you please take it through your tree..
> I think you might not have it in your queue as you were not in the
> original recipient list, if so, I can send it after adding my Ack to
> it.

Now picked up, thanks.

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ