[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42b60dd8-8393-5e0f-e576-da5303f29fe7@colorfullife.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:35:58 +0200
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc: replace costly bailout check in sysvipc_find_ipc()
Hi Rafael,
On 8/9/21 10:35 PM, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> sysvipc_find_ipc() was left with a costly way to check if the offset
> position fed to it is bigger than the total number of IPC IDs in use.
> So much so that the time it takes to iterate over /proc/sysvipc/* files
> grows exponentially for a custom benchmark that creates "N" SYSV shm
> segments and then times the read of /proc/sysvipc/shm (milliseconds):
>
> 12 msecs to read 1024 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 18 msecs to read 2048 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 65 msecs to read 4096 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 325 msecs to read 8192 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 1303 msecs to read 16384 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 5182 msecs to read 32768 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
>
> The root problem lies with the loop that computes the total amount of ids
> in use to check if the "pos" feeded to sysvipc_find_ipc() grew bigger than
> "ids->in_use". That is a quite inneficient way to get to the maximum index
> in the id lookup table, specially when that value is already provided by
> struct ipc_ids.max_idx.
>
> This patch follows up on the optimization introduced via commit 15df03c879836
> ("sysvipc: make get_maxid O(1) again") and gets rid of the aforementioned
> costly loop replacing it by a simpler checkpoint based on ipc_get_maxidx()
> returned value, which allows for a smooth linear increase in time complexity
> for the same custom benchmark:
>
> 2 msecs to read 1024 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 2 msecs to read 2048 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 4 msecs to read 4096 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 9 msecs to read 8192 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 19 msecs to read 16384 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 39 msecs to read 32768 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
I've tested the patch, no issues or objections.
Thus: Let's merge your patch, and then switch to ipc_get_next() later.
Acked-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
--
Manfred
Powered by blists - more mailing lists