linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] perf/x86: Add compiler barrier after updating BTS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 29 Aug 2021 18:56:57 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
        "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        coresight@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] perf/x86: Add compiler barrier after updating BTS

Hi Peter, or any x86 maintainer,

On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 07:14:02PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> Since BTS is coherent, simply add a compiler barrier to separate the BTS
> update and aux_head store.

Could you reivew this patch and check if BTS needs the comipler
barrier in this case?  Thanks.

> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c
> index 6320d2cfd9d3..974e917e65b2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c
> @@ -209,6 +209,12 @@ static void bts_update(struct bts_ctx *bts)
>  	} else {
>  		local_set(&buf->data_size, head);
>  	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Since BTS is coherent, just add compiler barrier to ensure
> +	 * BTS updating is ordered against bts::handle::event.
> +	 */
> +	barrier();
>  }
>  
>  static int
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>