linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] clk: qcom: use power-domain for sm8250's clock controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <163020909027.2218116.11109424225803296345@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Sat, 28 Aug 2021 20:51:30 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] clk: qcom: use power-domain for sm8250's clock controllers

Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-08-26 14:56:23)
> On 26/08/2021 21:31, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-07-27 13:19:56)
> >> On SM8250 both the display and video clock controllers are powered up by
> >> the MMCX power domain. Handle this by linking clock controllers to the
> >> proper power domain, and using runtime power management to enable and
> >> disable the MMCX power domain.
> >>
> >> Dependencies:
> >> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20210703005416.2668319-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org/
> >>    (pending)
> > 
> > Does this patch series need to go through the qcom tree? Presumably the
> > dependency is going through qcom -> arm-soc
> 
> It looks like Bjorn did not apply his patches in the for-5.15 series, so 
> we'd have to wait anyway. Probably I should rebase these patches instead 
> on Rajendra's required-opps patch (which is going in this window).
> 

Ok. Thanks. I'll drop it from my queue for now.