linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bcache: remove the redundant judgment on bi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7a523ae04e6c412e98ca00275ed4ad1a@h3c.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Aug 2021 02:05:20 +0000
From:   Xifengfei <xi.fengfei@....com>
To:     Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
CC:     "linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kent.overstreet@...il.com" <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: remove the redundant judgment on bi_size

OK. Thanks for our explanation.   ^_^

Feng fei

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Coly Li [mailto:colyli@...e.de] 
发送时间: 2021年8月31日 9:35
收件人: xifengfei (RD) <xi.fengfei@....com>
抄送: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; kent.overstreet@...il.com
主题: Re: [PATCH] bcache: remove the redundant judgment on bi_size

On 8/30/21 2:29 PM, Xifengfei wrote:
> （Sorry, there was an obvious typo in the last email）
> Thanks a lot. I understand the purpose.
> So is the original judgment process too complicated?  Can we judge 
> bi_size directly?  This will be more concise
>
> @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static bool check_should_bypass(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio)
>          add_sequential(task);
>          i->sequential = 0;
>   found:
> -       if (i->sequential + bio->bi_iter.bi_size > i->sequential)
> +       if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size)
>                  i->sequential   += bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
>
>          i->last                  = bio_end_sector(bio);

The above change works, but the code readability decreased because how/why i->sequential is maintained is not that directly visible.

This is a difference of coding styles. IMHO for this particular case, the readability is more important than less CPU instructions.

Thanks.

Coly Li

> Thanks
> Fengfei
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Coly Li [mailto:colyli@...e.de]
> 发送时间: 2021年8月29日 15:50
> 收件人: xifengfei (RD) <xi.fengfei@....com>
> 抄送: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; 
> kent.overstreet@...il.com
> 主题: Re: [PATCH] bcache: remove the redundant judgment on bi_size
>
> On 8/29/21 12:49 PM, Fengfei Xi wrote:
>> The bi_size is unsigned int type data not less than 0, so we can 
>> directly add bi_size without extra judgment
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fengfei Xi <xi.fengfei@....com>
> NACK. The check is necessary to avoid redundant and unnecessary memory write.
>
> Coly Li
>
>> ---
>>    drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 4 +---
>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c 
>> b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c index 6d1de889b..2788eec3a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
>> @@ -423,9 +423,7 @@ static bool check_should_bypass(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio)
>>    	add_sequential(task);
>>    	i->sequential = 0;
>>    found:
>> -	if (i->sequential + bio->bi_iter.bi_size > i->sequential)
>> -		i->sequential	+= bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
>> -
>> +	i->sequential		+= bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
>>    	i->last			 = bio_end_sector(bio);
>>    	i->jiffies		 = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(5000);
>>    	task->sequential_io	 = i->sequential;