[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YS9ky9XiR+JkqSDF@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:32:27 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Huang Shijie <shijie@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc: Shijie Huang <shijie@...eremail.onmicrosoft.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Wang <zwang@...erecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: Is it possible to implement the per-node page cache for
programs/libraries?
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 02:25:34PM +0000, Huang Shijie wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 01:30:45PM +0000, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:25:01AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:07:41AM +0800, Shijie Huang wrote:
> > > > In the NUMA, we only have one page cache for each file. For the
> > > > program/shared libraries, the
> > > > remote-access delays longer then the local-access.
> > > >
> > > > So, is it possible to implement the per-node page cache for
> > > > programs/libraries?
> > >
> > > At this point, we have no way to support text replication within a
> > > process. So what you're suggesting (if implemented) would work for
> >
> > I created a glibc patch which can do the text replication within a process.
> The "text replication" means the shared libraries, not program itself.
Is it really worthwhile to do only the shared libraries?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists