[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YS9lwVU2Ie9Q62+X@silpixa00400314>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:36:33 +0100
From: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@...el.com>,
Wojciech Ziemba <wojciech.ziemba@...el.com>
Subject: Re: drivers/crypto/qat/qat_c62xvf/adf_c62xvf_hw_data.c:102:28:
warning: taking address of packed member 'csr_ops' of class or structure
'adf_hw_device_data' may result in an unaligned pointer value
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 02:18:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 12:19:08AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > >> drivers/crypto/qat/qat_c62xvf/adf_c62xvf_hw_data.c:102:28: warning: taking address of packed member 'csr_ops' of class or structure 'adf_hw_device_data' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
> > adf_gen2_init_hw_csr_ops(&hw_data->csr_ops);
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 3 warnings generated.
>
>
> Why on Earth the struct adf_hw_device_data, that contains a lot of pointers,
> marked as __packed?! That __packed has to be dropped.
That struct doesn't need to be marked as __packed.
I'm going to send a patch that drops that attribute for all the
structures that do not need to be packed in the QAT driver.
--
Giovanni
Powered by blists - more mailing lists