[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YTD8+tLP7KeGRXEc@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 18:34:02 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@....com>, rafael@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] debugfs: use IS_ERR to check for error
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 05:10:24PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 02.09.21 um 14:20 schrieb Greg KH:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 02:03:12PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 02.09.21 um 12:38 schrieb Greg KH:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:29:17PM +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> > > > > debugfs_create_file() returns encoded error so
> > > > > use IS_ERR for checking return value.
> > > > >
> > > > > References: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Famd%2F-%2Fissues%2F1686&data=04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cffc1109aeb744082181b08d96e0c06db%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637661820207117289%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=6NDHX9sEhGF2jakVfUJ7Qurql6UAdNpFQZ6XvCjwz0E%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@....com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > fs/debugfs/inode.c | 2 +-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/fs/debugfs/inode.c b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> > > > > index 8129a430d789..2f117c57160d 100644
> > > > > --- a/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> > > > > +++ b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> > > > > @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ void debugfs_create_file_size(const char *name, umode_t mode,
> > > > > {
> > > > > struct dentry *de = debugfs_create_file(name, mode, parent, data, fops);
> > > > > - if (de)
> > > > > + if (!IS_ERR(de))
> > > > > d_inode(de)->i_size = file_size;
> > > > > }
> > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_create_file_size);
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.32.0
> > > > >
> > > > Ah, good catch, I'll queue this up after 5.15-rc1 is out, thanks!
> > > Thinking more about this if I'm not completely mistaken
> > > debugfs_create_file() returns -ENODEV when debugfs is disabled and NULL on
> > > any other error.
> > How can this function be called if debugfs is not enabled in the system
> > configuration? This _is_ the debugfs core code.
>
> Well, that's what I meant. The original code is correct and Nirmoy's patch
> here is breaking it.
Ah, yes, sorry, you are right. This function can not return an error
value, if something went wrong, the result will always be NULL.
> Nirmoys other patch is for a driver and there the function can indeed return
> both error code and NULL.
You should never be checking this stuff in a caller anyway, so no, don't
do it there either.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists