linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: Drop unused kvm_dirty_gfn

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YTD+eBj+9+mb9LVg@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:40:24 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Drop unused kvm_dirty_gfn_harvested()

On Thu, Sep 02, 2021, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com> writes:
> 
> > Drop the unused function as reported by test bot.
> 
> Your subject line says "Drop unused kvm_dirty_gfn_harvested()" while in
> reallity you drop "kvm_dirty_gfn_invalid()".

Heh, Peter already sent v2[*].  Though that's a good reminder that it's helpful
to reviewers to respond to your own patch if there's a fatal mistake and you're
going to immediately post a new version.  For tiny patches it's not a big deal,
but for larger patches it can avoid wasting reviewers' time.

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210901230904.15164-1-peterx@redhat.com