linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1 [sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/snd-soc-mt8195-afe.ko]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <299c7f0a7b1dede1e2f704a0133f4045e85641b5.camel@mediatek.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:35:22 +0800
From:   Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Bicycle Tsai <bicycle.tsai@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1
 [sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/snd-soc-mt8195-afe.ko]

On Wed, 2021-09-01 at 13:55 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/1/21 1:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Please do not add any v5.16 related code to your linux-next
> > included
> > branches until after v5.15-rc1 has been released.
> > 
> > Changes since 20210831:
> > 
> 
> 
> on x86_64:
> 
> ERROR: modpost: "clkdev_add" [sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/snd-soc-
> mt8195-afe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "clkdev_drop" [sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/snd-soc-
> mt8195-afe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "clk_unregister_gate" [sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/snd-
> soc-mt8195-afe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "clk_register_gate" [sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/snd-
> soc-mt8195-afe.ko] undefined!
> 
> Full randconfig file is attached.
> 

Hi Randy,

The problem is caused by the dependency declaration, because it's not a
driver for x86_64.
The dependency declaration has been added in the following patch.


https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/alsa-devel/patch/7e628e359bde04ceb9ddd74a45931059b4a4623c.1630415860.git.geert+renesas@glider.be/

Thanks,
Trevor