lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:37:13 +0800
From:   王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "net: fix NULL pointer reference in
 cipso_v4_doi_free"



On 2021/9/2 上午5:05, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:21 PM 王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Paul, it confused me since it's the first time I face
>> such situation, but I just realized what you're asking is
>> actually this revert, correct?
> 
> I believe DaveM already answered your question in the other thread,
> but if you are still unsure about the patch let me know.

I do failed to get the point :-(

As I checked the:
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git

both v1 and v2 are there with the same description and both code modification
are applied.

We want revert v1 but not in a revert patch style, then do you suggest
send a normal patch to do the code revert?

Regards,
Michael Wang

> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ