[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YTIMhNAAtm/s2gjV@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 08:52:36 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
leo.yan@...aro.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, mike.leach@...aro.org,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] perf cs-etm: Print the decoder name
Em Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 08:18:46AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:17:25AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose escreveu:
> > On 06/08/2021 14:41, James Clark wrote:
> > > Use the real name of the decoder instead of hard-coding "ETM" to avoid
> > > confusion when the trace is ETE. This also now distinguishes between
> > > ETMv3 and ETMv4.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>
> Thanks, collected the Reviewed-by.
Everything is in my tmp.perf/core branch now, pending test build in my
containers.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists