[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a035a3ec4571a622ce640e042f9a119@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 10:03:18 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Len Baker <len.baker@....com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] EDAC/mc: Prefer strscpy or scnprintf over strcpy
On 2021-09-03 08:05, Len Baker wrote:
> strcpy() performs no bounds checking on the destination buffer.
> len.baker@....com/
[]
> @@ -1113,12 +1115,9 @@ void edac_mc_handle_error(const enum
> hw_event_mc_err_type type,
> p = e->label;
> *p = '\0';
> } else {
> - if (p != e->label) {
> - strcpy(p, OTHER_LABEL);
> - p += strlen(OTHER_LABEL);
> - }
> - strcpy(p, dimm->label);
> - p += strlen(p);
> + n += scnprintf(e->label + n, sizeof(e->label) - n,
> + "%s%s", prefix, dimm->label);
> + prefix = OTHER_LABEL;
OTHER_LABEL is a define specific to this module
IMO: Used once text macros are just obfuscating and should be removed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists