[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210908060200.7876-1-long870912@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:02:00 +0800
From: zhaoxiao <long870912@...il.com>
To: thierry.reding@...il.com, lee.jones@...aro.org
Cc: u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhaoxiao <long870912@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] pwm: ab8500: Don't check the return code of pwmchip_remove()
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of ab8500_pwm_remove()
and considers the device removed anyhow. So returning early results
in a resource leak.
Signed-off-by: zhaoxiao <long870912@...il.com>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-ab8500.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-ab8500.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-ab8500.c
index e2a26d9da25b..51132a076f7f 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-ab8500.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-ab8500.c
@@ -113,11 +113,8 @@ static int ab8500_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int ab8500_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct ab8500_pwm_chip *ab8500 = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- int err;
- err = pwmchip_remove(&ab8500->chip);
- if (err < 0)
- return err;
+ pwmchip_remove(&ab8500->chip);
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "pwm driver removed\n");
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists