[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b15b7da50186d8ec86857dce0a31f1e3@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 14:44:56 +0530
From: skakit@...eaurora.org
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
mka@...omium.org, kgunda@...eaurora.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8350c: Add pwm support
On 2021-09-08 09:04, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting satya priya (2021-09-06 03:41:07)
>> Add pwm support for PM8350C pmic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: satya priya <skakit@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
>> index e1b75ae..ecdae55 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
>> @@ -29,6 +29,12 @@
>> interrupt-controller;
>> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>> };
>> +
>> + pm8350c_pwm4: pwm {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pm8350c-pwm";
>
> Shouldn't there be a reg property?
>
The bindings do not specify reg property. I think it is because we are
adding the base address in struct "pm8350c_pwm_data".
>> + #pwm-cells = <2>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>> };
>> };
>>
>> --
>> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
>> member
>> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists