[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a07d3486-ab7e-24c1-63f9-b1566636015c@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 19:29:36 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Input: analog: Always use ktime functions
On 9/7/21 6:43 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 05:37:34AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> @@ -241,11 +176,11 @@ static int analog_cooked_read(struct analog_port *port)
>> int i, j;
>>
>> loopout = (ANALOG_LOOP_TIME * port->loop) / 1000;
>> - timeout = ANALOG_MAX_TIME * port->speed;
>> + timeout = ANALOG_MAX_TIME * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
>>
>> local_irq_save(flags);
>> gameport_trigger(gameport);
>> - now = get_time();
>> + now = ktime_get();
>
> There are time[4], now, etc variables above this block that are u64. I
> think they can be make ktime_t. I can do it myself if you agree.
>
Sure.
>> @@ -378,35 +313,19 @@ static void analog_calibrate_timer(struct analog_port *port)
>> u64 t1, t2, t3;
>
> I think these should also be ktime_t.
>
Ok. Do you want me to resend or are you going to make the changes ?
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists