lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210908034645.GA26100@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 8 Sep 2021 05:46:45 +0200
From:   Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
Cc:     robin@...tonic.nl, linux@...pel-privat.de, socketcan@...tkopp.net,
        mkl@...gutronix.de, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] can: j1939: fix errant WARN_ON_ONCE in
 j1939_session_deactivate

Hi,

Thank you for your patches. Please stay on hold, I'll review it end of
this week.

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 05:42:00PM +0800, Ziyang Xuan wrote:
> The conclusion "j1939_session_deactivate() should be called with a
> session ref-count of at least 2" is incorrect. In some concurrent
> scenarios, j1939_session_deactivate can be called with the session
> ref-count less than 2. But there is not any problem because it
> will check the session active state before session putting in
> j1939_session_deactivate_locked().
> 
> Here is the concurrent scenario of the problem reported by syzbot
> and my reproduction log.
> 
>         cpu0                            cpu1
>                                 j1939_xtp_rx_eoma
> j1939_xtp_rx_abort_one
>                                 j1939_session_get_by_addr [kref == 2]
> j1939_session_get_by_addr [kref == 3]
> j1939_session_deactivate [kref == 2]
> j1939_session_put [kref == 1]
> 				j1939_session_completed
> 				j1939_session_deactivate
> 				WARN_ON_ONCE(kref < 2)
> 
> =====================================================
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/can/j1939/transport.c:1088 j1939_session_deactivate+0x5f/0x70
> CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc7+ #32
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:j1939_session_deactivate+0x5f/0x70
> Call Trace:
>  j1939_session_deactivate_activate_next+0x11/0x28
>  j1939_xtp_rx_eoma+0x12a/0x180
>  j1939_tp_recv+0x4a2/0x510
>  j1939_can_recv+0x226/0x380
>  can_rcv_filter+0xf8/0x220
>  can_receive+0x102/0x220
>  ? process_backlog+0xf0/0x2c0
>  can_rcv+0x53/0xf0
>  __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x67/0x90
>  ? process_backlog+0x97/0x2c0
>  __netif_receive_skb+0x22/0x80
> 
> Fixes: 0c71437dd50d ("can: j1939: j1939_session_deactivate(): clarify lifetime of session object")
> Reported-by: syzbot+9981a614060dcee6eeca@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
> ---
>  net/can/j1939/transport.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> index bdc95bd7a851..0f8309314075 100644
> --- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> +++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> @@ -1079,10 +1079,6 @@ static bool j1939_session_deactivate(struct j1939_session *session)
>  	bool active;
>  
>  	j1939_session_list_lock(priv);
> -	/* This function should be called with a session ref-count of at
> -	 * least 2.
> -	 */
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(kref_read(&session->kref) < 2);
>  	active = j1939_session_deactivate_locked(session);
>  	j1939_session_list_unlock(priv);
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ