[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210910060251.GC7203@kadam>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:02:51 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Li Li <dualli@...omium.org>
Cc: dualli@...gle.com, tkjos@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
christian@...uner.io, arve@...roid.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maco@...gle.com, hridya@...gle.com,
surenb@...gle.com, joel@...lfernandes.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] binder: fix freeze race
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:21:41PM -0700, Li Li wrote:
> @@ -4648,6 +4647,22 @@ static int binder_ioctl_get_node_debug_info(struct binder_proc *proc,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int binder_txns_pending(struct binder_proc *proc)
> +{
> + struct rb_node *n;
> + struct binder_thread *thread;
> +
> + if (proc->outstanding_txns > 0)
> + return 1;
Make this function bool.
> +
> + for (n = rb_first(&proc->threads); n; n = rb_next(n)) {
> + thread = rb_entry(n, struct binder_thread, rb_node);
> + if (thread->transaction_stack)
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int binder_ioctl_freeze(struct binder_freeze_info *info,
> struct binder_proc *target_proc)
> {
> @@ -4682,6 +4697,14 @@ static int binder_ioctl_freeze(struct binder_freeze_info *info,
> if (!ret && target_proc->outstanding_txns)
> ret = -EAGAIN;
These two lines can be deleted now because binder_txns_pending() checks
->outstanding_txns.
>
> + /* Also check pending transactions that wait for reply */
> + if (ret >= 0) {
> + binder_inner_proc_lock(target_proc);
> + if (binder_txns_pending(target_proc))
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> + binder_inner_proc_unlock(target_proc);
> + }
> +
> if (ret < 0) {
> binder_inner_proc_lock(target_proc);
> target_proc->is_frozen = false;
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists