lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANBPYPgCUgjpX38dNR+SyPVBUTF_go0saTmitO_z+Ox3AgkCdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Sep 2021 00:04:35 -0700
From:   Li Li <dualli@...omium.org>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Li Li <dualli@...gle.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
        "open list:ANDROID DRIVERS" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martijn Coenen <maco@...gle.com>,
        Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] binder: fix freeze race

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 11:03 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:21:41PM -0700, Li Li wrote:
> > @@ -4648,6 +4647,22 @@ static int binder_ioctl_get_node_debug_info(struct binder_proc *proc,
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int binder_txns_pending(struct binder_proc *proc)
> > +{
> > +     struct rb_node *n;
> > +     struct binder_thread *thread;
> > +
> > +     if (proc->outstanding_txns > 0)
> > +             return 1;
>
> Make this function bool.

Will include the change (as well as the extra ->outstanding_txns
check) in the next revision.
>
> > +
> > +     for (n = rb_first(&proc->threads); n; n = rb_next(n)) {
> > +             thread = rb_entry(n, struct binder_thread, rb_node);
> > +             if (thread->transaction_stack)
> > +                     return 1;
> > +     }
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int binder_ioctl_freeze(struct binder_freeze_info *info,
> >                              struct binder_proc *target_proc)
> >  {
> > @@ -4682,6 +4697,14 @@ static int binder_ioctl_freeze(struct binder_freeze_info *info,
> >       if (!ret && target_proc->outstanding_txns)
> >               ret = -EAGAIN;
>
> These two lines can be deleted now because binder_txns_pending() checks
> ->outstanding_txns.
>

Thanks,
Li

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ