linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] scripts: ftrace - move the nop-processing in ftrace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210911143352.GA4323@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:33:52 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Yinan Liu <yinan@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     rostedt@...dmis.org, mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scripts: ftrace - move the nop-processing in
 ftrace_init to compile time

On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 09:50:43PM +0800, Yinan Liu wrote:
> When ftrace is enabled, ftrace_init will consume a period of
> time, usually around 15~20ms. Approximately 60% of the time is
> consumed by nop-processing. Moving the nop-processing to the
> compile time can speed up the kernel boot process.
> 
> performance test:
>         env:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2682 v4 @ 2.50GHz

If you use objtool's -M argument instead of recordmcount, you already
get this and you can avoid running recordmcount entirely.