[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51815fbe3e864a0177445b9b17d018a42d603e21.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 04:23:12 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@...il.com>,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: ksmbd,transport_rdma.c: Don't include rwlock.h directly
typing hard.. Thag forget type [patch]
On Sun, 2021-09-12 at 04:19 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> rwlock.h specifically asks to not be included directly.
>
> In fact, the proper spinlock.h include isn't needed either,
> it comes with the huge pile that kthread.h ends up pulling
> in, so just drop it entirely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> ---
> fs/ksmbd/transport_rdma.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/fs/ksmbd/transport_rdma.c
> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/transport_rdma.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
> #define SUBMOD_NAME "smb_direct"
>
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> -#include <linux/rwlock.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/mempool.h>
> #include <linux/highmem.h>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists