lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yt9dk0jkbhvw.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 17:43:47 +0200
From:   Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: convert tests to kunit

Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> writes:

[ +CC linux-kernel, missed that in the initial message ]

> On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:27:48 +0200
> Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Great! thanks for you updating the test case.
> BTW, can you add some description for this patch?

Not sure what to write there, as the conversion is pretty
self-explaining. I'll think about it :-)

>> Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/kprobes.c      |   3 -
>>  kernel/test_kprobes.c | 223 ++++++++++++------------------------------
>>  lib/Kconfig.debug     |   1 +
>>  3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
>> index 790a573bbe00..adf6ed1932c2 100644
>> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
>> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
>> @@ -2508,9 +2508,6 @@ static int __init init_kprobes(void)
>>  		err = register_module_notifier(&kprobe_module_nb);
>>  
>>  	kprobes_initialized = (err == 0);
>> -
>> -	if (!err)
>> -		init_test_probes();
>
> Also, I'm interested in when the test will be executed.

I checked the kunit code, and the unit tests run as late initcall,
while kprobes is an early initcall. So the ordering should still be
fine. If you think the sanity tests should run immediately after kprobes
startup, i'm not sure whether that's possible with kunit.

> Thank you,
>
>>  	return err;
>>  }
>>  early_initcall(init_kprobes);
>> diff --git a/kernel/test_kprobes.c b/kernel/test_kprobes.c
>> index 76c997fdbc9d..06adede697a4 100644
>> --- a/kernel/test_kprobes.c
>> +++ b/kernel/test_kprobes.c
>> @@ -5,18 +5,17 @@
>>   * Copyright IBM Corp. 2008
>>   */
>>  
>> -#define pr_fmt(fmt) "Kprobe smoke test: " fmt
>> -
>>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>  #include <linux/kprobes.h>
>>  #include <linux/random.h>
>> +#include <kunit/test.h>
>>  
>>  #define div_factor 3
>>  
>>  static u32 rand1, preh_val, posth_val;
>> -static int errors, handler_errors, num_tests;
>>  static u32 (*target)(u32 value);
>>  static u32 (*target2)(u32 value);
>> +static struct kunit *current_test;
>>  
>>  static noinline u32 kprobe_target(u32 value)
>>  {
>> @@ -25,10 +24,7 @@ static noinline u32 kprobe_target(u32 value)
>>  
>>  static int kp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>  {
>> -	if (preemptible()) {
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -		pr_err("pre-handler is preemptible\n");
>> -	}
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(current_test, preemptible());
>>  	preh_val = (rand1 / div_factor);
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -36,14 +32,8 @@ static int kp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>  static void kp_post_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
>>  		unsigned long flags)
>>  {
>> -	if (preemptible()) {
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -		pr_err("post-handler is preemptible\n");
>> -	}
>> -	if (preh_val != (rand1 / div_factor)) {
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -		pr_err("incorrect value in post_handler\n");
>> -	}
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(current_test, preemptible());
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(current_test, preh_val, (rand1 / div_factor));
>>  	posth_val = preh_val + div_factor;
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -53,30 +43,14 @@ static struct kprobe kp = {
>>  	.post_handler = kp_post_handler
>>  };
>>  
>> -static int test_kprobe(void)
>> +static void test_kprobe(struct kunit *test)
>>  {
>> -	int ret;
>> -
>> -	ret = register_kprobe(&kp);
>> -	if (ret < 0) {
>> -		pr_err("register_kprobe returned %d\n", ret);
>> -		return ret;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	ret = target(rand1);
>> +	current_test = test;
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, register_kprobe(&kp));
>> +	target(rand1);
>>  	unregister_kprobe(&kp);
>> -
>> -	if (preh_val == 0) {
>> -		pr_err("kprobe pre_handler not called\n");
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	if (posth_val == 0) {
>> -		pr_err("kprobe post_handler not called\n");
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	return 0;
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, preh_val);
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, posth_val);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static noinline u32 kprobe_target2(u32 value)
>> @@ -93,10 +67,7 @@ static int kp_pre_handler2(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>  static void kp_post_handler2(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
>>  		unsigned long flags)
>>  {
>> -	if (preh_val != (rand1 / div_factor) + 1) {
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -		pr_err("incorrect value in post_handler2\n");
>> -	}
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(current_test, preh_val, (rand1 / div_factor) + 1);
>>  	posth_val = preh_val + div_factor;
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -106,51 +77,31 @@ static struct kprobe kp2 = {
>>  	.post_handler = kp_post_handler2
>>  };
>>  
>> -static int test_kprobes(void)
>> +static void test_kprobes(struct kunit *test)
>>  {
>> -	int ret;
>>  	struct kprobe *kps[2] = {&kp, &kp2};
>>  
>> +	current_test = test;
>> +
>>  	/* addr and flags should be cleard for reusing kprobe. */
>>  	kp.addr = NULL;
>>  	kp.flags = 0;
>> -	ret = register_kprobes(kps, 2);
>> -	if (ret < 0) {
>> -		pr_err("register_kprobes returned %d\n", ret);
>> -		return ret;
>> -	}
>>  
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, register_kprobes(kps, 2));
>>  	preh_val = 0;
>>  	posth_val = 0;
>> -	ret = target(rand1);
>> +	target(rand1);
>>  
>> -	if (preh_val == 0) {
>> -		pr_err("kprobe pre_handler not called\n");
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	if (posth_val == 0) {
>> -		pr_err("kprobe post_handler not called\n");
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -	}
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, preh_val);
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, posth_val);
>>  
>>  	preh_val = 0;
>>  	posth_val = 0;
>> -	ret = target2(rand1);
>> -
>> -	if (preh_val == 0) {
>> -		pr_err("kprobe pre_handler2 not called\n");
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	if (posth_val == 0) {
>> -		pr_err("kprobe post_handler2 not called\n");
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -	}
>> +	target2(rand1);
>>  
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, preh_val);
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, posth_val);
>>  	unregister_kprobes(kps, 2);
>> -	return 0;
>> -
>>  }
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
>> @@ -158,10 +109,7 @@ static u32 krph_val;
>>  
>>  static int entry_handler(struct kretprobe_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>  {
>> -	if (preemptible()) {
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -		pr_err("kretprobe entry handler is preemptible\n");
>> -	}
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(current_test, preemptible());
>>  	krph_val = (rand1 / div_factor);
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -170,19 +118,9 @@ static int return_handler(struct kretprobe_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>  {
>>  	unsigned long ret = regs_return_value(regs);
>>  
>> -	if (preemptible()) {
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -		pr_err("kretprobe return handler is preemptible\n");
>> -	}
>> -	if (ret != (rand1 / div_factor)) {
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -		pr_err("incorrect value in kretprobe handler\n");
>> -	}
>> -	if (krph_val == 0) {
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -		pr_err("call to kretprobe entry handler failed\n");
>> -	}
>> -
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(current_test, preemptible());
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(current_test, ret, rand1 / div_factor);
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(current_test, krph_val, 0);
>>  	krph_val = rand1;
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -193,39 +131,21 @@ static struct kretprobe rp = {
>>  	.kp.symbol_name = "kprobe_target"
>>  };
>>  
>> -static int test_kretprobe(void)
>> +static void test_kretprobe(struct kunit *test)
>>  {
>> -	int ret;
>> -
>> -	ret = register_kretprobe(&rp);
>> -	if (ret < 0) {
>> -		pr_err("register_kretprobe returned %d\n", ret);
>> -		return ret;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	ret = target(rand1);
>> +	current_test = test;
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, register_kretprobe(&rp));
>> +	target(rand1);
>>  	unregister_kretprobe(&rp);
>> -	if (krph_val != rand1) {
>> -		pr_err("kretprobe handler not called\n");
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	return 0;
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, krph_val, rand1);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int return_handler2(struct kretprobe_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>  {
>>  	unsigned long ret = regs_return_value(regs);
>>  
>> -	if (ret != (rand1 / div_factor) + 1) {
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -		pr_err("incorrect value in kretprobe handler2\n");
>> -	}
>> -	if (krph_val == 0) {
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -		pr_err("call to kretprobe entry handler failed\n");
>> -	}
>> -
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(current_test, ret, (rand1 / div_factor) + 1);
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(current_test, krph_val, 0);
>>  	krph_val = rand1;
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -236,78 +156,57 @@ static struct kretprobe rp2 = {
>>  	.kp.symbol_name = "kprobe_target2"
>>  };
>>  
>> -static int test_kretprobes(void)
>> +static void test_kretprobes(struct kunit *test)
>>  {
>> -	int ret;
>>  	struct kretprobe *rps[2] = {&rp, &rp2};
>>  
>> +	current_test = test;
>>  	/* addr and flags should be cleard for reusing kprobe. */
>>  	rp.kp.addr = NULL;
>>  	rp.kp.flags = 0;
>> -	ret = register_kretprobes(rps, 2);
>> -	if (ret < 0) {
>> -		pr_err("register_kretprobe returned %d\n", ret);
>> -		return ret;
>> -	}
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, register_kretprobes(rps, 2));
>>  
>>  	krph_val = 0;
>> -	ret = target(rand1);
>> -	if (krph_val != rand1) {
>> -		pr_err("kretprobe handler not called\n");
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -	}
>> +	target(rand1);
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, krph_val, rand1);
>>  
>>  	krph_val = 0;
>> -	ret = target2(rand1);
>> -	if (krph_val != rand1) {
>> -		pr_err("kretprobe handler2 not called\n");
>> -		handler_errors++;
>> -	}
>> +	target2(rand1);
>> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, krph_val, rand1);
>>  	unregister_kretprobes(rps, 2);
>> -	return 0;
>>  }
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_KRETPROBES */
>>  
>> -int init_test_probes(void)
>> +static int kprobes_test_init(struct kunit *test)
>>  {
>> -	int ret;
>> -
>>  	target = kprobe_target;
>>  	target2 = kprobe_target2;
>>  
>>  	do {
>>  		rand1 = prandom_u32();
>>  	} while (rand1 <= div_factor);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>>  
>> -	pr_info("started\n");
>> -	num_tests++;
>> -	ret = test_kprobe();
>> -	if (ret < 0)
>> -		errors++;
>> -
>> -	num_tests++;
>> -	ret = test_kprobes();
>> -	if (ret < 0)
>> -		errors++;
>> +static void kprobes_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> +}

I noticed that kprobes_test_exit() is a leftover, i'll remove that with
v2.

>> +static struct kunit_case kprobes_testcases[] = {
>> +	KUNIT_CASE(test_kprobe),
>> +	KUNIT_CASE(test_kprobes),
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
>> -	num_tests++;
>> -	ret = test_kretprobe();
>> -	if (ret < 0)
>> -		errors++;
>> -
>> -	num_tests++;
>> -	ret = test_kretprobes();
>> -	if (ret < 0)
>> -		errors++;
>> -#endif /* CONFIG_KRETPROBES */
>> +	KUNIT_CASE(test_kretprobe),
>> +	KUNIT_CASE(test_kretprobes),
>> +#endif
>> +	{}
>> +};
>>  
>> -	if (errors)
>> -		pr_err("BUG: %d out of %d tests failed\n", errors, num_tests);
>> -	else if (handler_errors)
>> -		pr_err("BUG: %d error(s) running handlers\n", handler_errors);
>> -	else
>> -		pr_info("passed successfully\n");
>> +static struct kunit_suite kprobes_test_suite = {
>> +	.name = "kprobes_test",
>> +	.init = kprobes_test_init,
>> +	.test_cases = kprobes_testcases,
>> +};
>> +
>> +kunit_test_suites(&kprobes_test_suite);
>>  
>> -	return 0;
>> -}
>> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> index 5ddd575159fb..2bfdf2b6ef39 100644
>> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> @@ -2100,6 +2100,7 @@ config KPROBES_SANITY_TEST
>>  	bool "Kprobes sanity tests"
>>  	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
>>  	depends on KPROBES
>> +	depends on KUNIT
>>  	help
>>  	  This option provides for testing basic kprobes functionality on
>>  	  boot. Samples of kprobe and kretprobe are inserted and
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ