[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YT8O/NL2pEGUjYj9@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 09:42:36 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jan H??ppner <hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, chaitanya.kulkarni@....com,
atulgopinathan@...il.com, hare@...e.de, maximlevitsky@...il.com,
oakad@...oo.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org, colin.king@...onical.com,
shubhankarvk@...il.com, baijiaju1990@...il.com, trix@...hat.com,
dongsheng.yang@...ystack.cn, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
sth@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, tj@...nel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] s390/block/dasd_genhd: add error handling support
for add_disk()
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:17:48AM +0200, Jan H??ppner wrote:
> I think, just like with some of the other changes, there is some
> cleanup required before returning. I'll prepare a patch and
> come back to you.
If you are touching the dasd probe path anyway, can you look insto
switching to use blk_mq_alloc_disk as well? Right now dasd allocates
the request_queue and gendisk separately in different stages of
initialization, but unlike SCSI which needs to probe using just the
request_queue I can't find a good reason for that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists