lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93bfc4ce-62f1-e21c-5dca-82029b2fc388@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 14:15:10 +0200
From:   Jan Höppner <hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, chaitanya.kulkarni@....com,
        atulgopinathan@...il.com, hare@...e.de, maximlevitsky@...il.com,
        oakad@...oo.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org, colin.king@...onical.com,
        shubhankarvk@...il.com, baijiaju1990@...il.com, trix@...hat.com,
        dongsheng.yang@...ystack.cn, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
        sth@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, tj@...nel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] s390/block/dasd_genhd: add error handling support for
 add_disk()

On 13/09/2021 10:42, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:17:48AM +0200, Jan H??ppner wrote:
>> I think, just like with some of the other changes, there is some
>> cleanup required before returning. I'll prepare a patch and
>> come back to you.
> 
> If you are touching the dasd probe path anyway, can you look insto
> switching to use blk_mq_alloc_disk as well?  Right now dasd allocates
> the request_queue and gendisk separately in different stages of
> initialization, but unlike SCSI which needs to probe using just the
> request_queue I can't find a good reason for that.
> 

Thanks for the hint. We'll be working on it separately though, as
it seems to require a bit more effort from a first glance.
We'll send a separate patch (or patchset) soon.

regards,
Jan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ