linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: ti: rename CONFIG_SND_SOC_DM365_VOICE_CODEC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:53:27 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        P���ter Ujfalusi 
        <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: ti: rename CONFIG_SND_SOC_DM365_VOICE_CODEC_MODULE

On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 01:40:09 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Kconfig generates include/generated/autoconf.h to make CONFIG options
> available to the pre-processor. Symbols with the value 'm' are suffixed
> with '_MODULE'
> 
> Here is a conflict; CONFIG_FOO=m results in '#define CONFIG_FOO_MODULE 1',
> but CONFIG_FOO_MODULE=y also results in the same define.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: ti: rename CONFIG_SND_SOC_DM365_VOICE_CODEC_MODULE
      commit: 0f3dd4e09addc00d5b87761793b08927e7903181

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark