[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6af73a2-f12d-eeef-616e-ae0cdb4f6f2d@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:11:06 +0800
From: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
CC: <axboe@...nel.dk>, <josef@...icpanda.com>, <hch@...radead.org>,
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<nbd@...er.debian.org>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] nbd: convert to use blk_mq_find_and_get_req()
On 2021/09/14 9:11, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 10:12:55PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> blk_mq_tag_to_rq() can only ensure to return valid request in
>> following situation:
>>
>> 1) client send request message to server first
>> submit_bio
>> ...
>> blk_mq_get_tag
>> ...
>> blk_mq_get_driver_tag
>> ...
>> nbd_queue_rq
>> nbd_handle_cmd
>> nbd_send_cmd
>>
>> 2) client receive respond message from server
>> recv_work
>> nbd_read_stat
>> blk_mq_tag_to_rq
>>
>> If step 1) is missing, blk_mq_tag_to_rq() will return a stale
>> request, which might be freed. Thus convert to use
>> blk_mq_find_and_get_req() to make sure the returned request is not
>> freed.
>
> But NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT has been added for checking if the reply is
> expected, do we still need blk_mq_find_and_get_req() for covering
> this issue? BTW, request and its payload is pre-allocated, so there
> isn't real use-after-free.
Hi, Ming
Checking NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT relied on the request founded by tag is valid,
not the other way round.
nbd_read_stat
req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq()
cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req)
mutex_lock(cmd->lock)
checking NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT
The checking doesn't have any effect on blk_mq_tag_to_rq().
Thanks,
Kuai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists