[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YT/2z4PSeW5oJWMq@T590>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:11:43 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, josef@...icpanda.com, hch@...radead.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nbd@...er.debian.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] nbd: convert to use blk_mq_find_and_get_req()
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 10:12:55PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> blk_mq_tag_to_rq() can only ensure to return valid request in
> following situation:
>
> 1) client send request message to server first
> submit_bio
> ...
> blk_mq_get_tag
> ...
> blk_mq_get_driver_tag
> ...
> nbd_queue_rq
> nbd_handle_cmd
> nbd_send_cmd
>
> 2) client receive respond message from server
> recv_work
> nbd_read_stat
> blk_mq_tag_to_rq
>
> If step 1) is missing, blk_mq_tag_to_rq() will return a stale
> request, which might be freed. Thus convert to use
> blk_mq_find_and_get_req() to make sure the returned request is not
> freed.
But NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT has been added for checking if the reply is
expected, do we still need blk_mq_find_and_get_req() for covering
this issue? BTW, request and its payload is pre-allocated, so there
isn't real use-after-free.
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists