linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] 9p: (untested) Convert to using the netfs helper lib to do reads and caching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YUEZXktGOCUWfvnU@codewreck.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 Sep 2021 06:51:26 +0900
From:   Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] 9p: (untested) Convert to using the netfs helper lib
 to do reads and caching

Hi folks,

David Howells wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 03:09:39PM +0100:
> > Does this change require any of the earlier patches in the series? If
> > not, then it may be good to go ahead and merge this conversion
> > separately, ahead of the rest of the series.
> 
> There's a conflict with patch 1 - you can see the same changes made to afs and
> ceph there, but apart from that, no.  However, I can't do patch 6 without it
> being applied first.  If Dominique or one of the other 9p people can get Linus
> to apply it now, that would be great, but I think that unlikely since the
> merge window has passed.

Agreed with the merge window passed it'll be for next one -- but I'd
like this to sit in -next for as long as possible, so I'd appreciate
either being able to carry the patch in my tree (difficult as then
you'll need to base yourself on mine) or you putting it in there somehow
after I've got the most basic tests verified again (do you have a branch
pulled for linux-next?)

I'll try to get tests done in the next few days and check my notes for
things that were missing in the earlier version you gave me in the
past.. Sorry for not doing it myself, you're of great help.
-- 
Dominique