linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 05/13] blk-mq-sched: Rename blk_mq_sched_alloc_{tags -> map_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4a139bf3-d536-4f9c-8cd2-6fbd6da7d6c4@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:10:47 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        <ming.lei@...hat.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 05/13] blk-mq-sched: Rename
 blk_mq_sched_alloc_{tags -> map_and_rqs}()


>> +static int blk_mq_sched_alloc_map_and_rqs(struct request_queue *q,
>> +                      struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>> +                      unsigned int hctx_idx)
>>   {
>>       struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
>>       int ret;
>> @@ -609,15 +609,15 @@ int blk_mq_init_sched(struct request_queue *q, 
>> struct elevator_type *e)
>>                      BLKDEV_DEFAULT_RQ);
>>       queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
>> -        ret = blk_mq_sched_alloc_tags(q, hctx, i);
>> +        ret = blk_mq_sched_alloc_map_and_rqs(q, hctx, i);
>>           if (ret)
>> -            goto err_free_tags;
>> +            goto err_free_map_and_rqs;
>>       }
>>       if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set->flags)) {
>>           ret = blk_mq_init_sched_shared_sbitmap(q);
>>           if (ret)
>> -            goto err_free_tags;
>> +            goto err_free_map_and_rqs;
>>       }
>>       ret = e->ops.init_sched(q, e);
>> @@ -645,8 +645,8 @@ int blk_mq_init_sched(struct request_queue *q, 
>> struct elevator_type *e)
>>   err_free_sbitmap:
>>       if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set->flags))
>>           blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap(q);
>> -err_free_tags:
>>       blk_mq_sched_free_requests(q);
>> +err_free_map_and_rqs:
>>       blk_mq_sched_tags_teardown(q);
>>       q->elevator = NULL;
>>       return ret;
>>
> This is not only a rename, but it also moves the location of the label.
> Is that intended?
> If so it needs some documentation why this is safe.

Yeah, I think you're right.

The final code in the series looks correct, but this is a transient 
breakage.

I'll fix it.

Thanks,
John