[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDw6_iMxGyCK8vrwgV-zMyHtNKBksxs3OpbpK=houzp2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:45:19 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] sched/fair: Simplify load_cfs_rq_list maintenance
On Tue, 14 Sept 2021 at 11:22, Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 04:19:27PM +0200, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> wrote:
> > Your proposal looks interesting but I need more time to make sure that
> > all cases are covered. We have faced several odd corner cases and
> > sequences in the past that I need time to check that you don't put
> > some back
>
> Do you have any pointers to the cases that come to your mind? I wonder
> if those could be reproduced with a simple setup.
I don't have a strict list but several warnings for leaf_list have
been already reported on lkml in the past and the use cases were quite
complicated and I want to go through them to make sure they are still
covered.
Vincent
> (FTR, I used the LTP test (at b673f49ae) cfs_bandwidth01 to check this change.)
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists