linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] staging: r8188eu: power management cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:45:33 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
        Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] staging: r8188eu: power management cleanup

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 08:51:02PM +0200, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> Remove some unused parts of the power management code.
> 
> Tested with Edimax EW-7811Un V2 on an ARM32 embedded system.
> 
> v2:
> - rebased against today's staging-testing branch
> - fixed one patch that changed files outside of the r8188eu driver

In future, when you're resending a v2 could you just create a new
thread?  We used to encourage people to send it on the same thread but
these days it's more common to start a new thread.  Also staging doesn't
used patchwork but subsystems which use patchwork prefer new threads or
patchwork gets messed up somehow.

regards,
dan carpenter