linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/7] pwm: ep93xx: Prepare clock before using it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210914101938.mo6puyhgp276jyu2@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:19:38 +0200
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] pwm: ep93xx: Prepare clock before using it

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:15:14PM +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> Thank you, Uwe,
> 
> On Tue, 2021-09-14 at 09:58 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 01:30:41AM +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> > > > > Use clk_prepare_enable()/clk_disable_unprepare() in preparation for switch
> > > > > to Common Clock Framework.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe it would make sense to move the prepare into the probe function?!
> > > > Anyhow, for now preparing the driver for the common-clk switch is the
> > > > focus and for that the conversion is correct, so:
> > > > 
> > > > Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > > 
> > > would you take this patch only, please?
> > > It didn't work out to sell the whole series as one piece and
> > > most of them were taken individually...
> > 
> > Hmm, this patch is marked as accepted in patchwork
> > (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pwm/patch/20210613233041.128961-8-alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com/).
> > There is also a v2, that is also marked as accepted
> > (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pwm/patch/20210726140001.24820-8-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me/).
> > 
> > Not sure what want wrong here
> 
> Sorry for the noise!

No, it's no noise because I didn't see either of the versions in any
tree. So the patches were marked as applied without being applied ...

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)