lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210914112628.GA1412445@bjorn-Precision-5520>
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 06:26:28 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc:     Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 5.15-rc1

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 08:21:46AM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 14.09.2021 01:46, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATTANSIC, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_blacklist_vpd);
> >  /*
> 
> Leaving the quirks in FIXUP_HEADER stage would have the advantage that for
> blacklisted devices the vpd sysfs attribute isn't visibale. The needed
> changes to the patch are minimal.

What do you have in mind?  The only thing I can think of would be to
add a "pci_dev.no_vpd" bit.  "vpd.cap == 0" means the device has no
VPD, and "vpd.len == 0" means we haven't determined the size yet.  All
devices start off with vpd.cap == 0 and vpd.len == 0, so a
FIXUP_HEADER quirk would have to set a sentinel value or some other
bit.

Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ