[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUCHwYo525+/98wq@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 13:30:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, 21cnbao@...il.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
prime.zeng@...wei.com,
"guodong.xu@...aro.org" <guodong.xu@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Perfomance varies according to sysctl_sched_migration_cost
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 03:27:09PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> 2. The ABI now has been removed from sysctl and moved to debugfs. As tuning this can improve the performance
> of some workloads on some platforms, maybe it's better to make it a formal sysctl again with docs?
It never was an ABI, there is nothing to restore. It has always been
CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG.
I'm open to topology based improvements to the code, but I don't think
user tunables are a good way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists