lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210914133007.GE2116@kadam>
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 16:30:07 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Cc:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
        Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/18] staging: r8188eu: hal: Clean up
 usbctrl_vendorreq()

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 03:24:06PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 11:24:05 AM CEST Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > I don't understand why you moved these from the top to the bottom.
> > But the original was better.  In networking code declarations are
> > normally written in Reverse Christmas Tree format, longest to shortest,
> > like this:
> > 
> > 	long long long_name;
> > 	medium name;
> > 	u8 short;
> 
> Dear Dan,
> 
> I'm sorry that I forgot to thank you for the reviews in the other messages I 
> sent in reply. :(
> 
> I also forgot to answer to the above question...
> 
> I changed the order of the declarations because David Laight wrote "I think 
> you'll need 'reverse xmas tree' ordering as well." (copy-paste from his 
> message).
> 
> As far as I know you are both experienced kernel developers, so I took his 
> words for truth. Is it a matter of personal taste or Reverse/Non Reverse Xmas 
> Trees are strictly required by the Linux kernel coding style guidelines?

David and I are saying the same thing.  "Reverse Christmas Tree" vs
"reverse xmas tree".  It's like an upside down pine tree.

	asfklajsdfljasldf
	asdflkjasldfjal
	asdflkjalsdfj
	asldfkjalsdf
	asldfkjl98
	lwkejrlw
	ljklkjl
	lkjkll
	kjld
	asdf
	x

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ