[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a24NTmkyh01OEzDQ8=oTWpUnDtwWQgUUxUbW2wxsgAFeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:54:04 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
Cc: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as MStar/Sigmastar Armv7 SoC maintainers
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 4:57 AM Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 04:03, Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > As proposed by Daniel, I am going to help him to maintain the platform,
> > so add myself as co-maintainer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 3a9a7cbf9456..ad1a0e5a5425 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -2231,6 +2231,7 @@ F: arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c
> >
> > ARM/MStar/Sigmastar Armv7 SoC support
> > M: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...ngy.jp>
> > +M: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
> > L: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> > S: Maintained
> > W: http://linux-chenxing.org/
> > --
> > 2.33.0
> >
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...ngy.jp>
>
> For everyone else: For MStar/SigmaStar I have a ~350 commit backlog
> that makes almost everything work on these machines.
> It's impossible for me to finish up working out the hardware and clean
> up and push patches without the whole process taking years.
> Romain stepped up to help out and has been pulling out patches,
> cleaning them up and pushing them. He deserves to be listed as a
> maintainer.
Sounds good to me.
One process issue though: These emails were sent 'cc:soc@...nel.org', so
they end up in patchwork, but I'm guessing they were not actually meant
for us to apply from there. I'm happy to take merge these patches (or
a future version of the series) directly from patchwork if that's what you
both had in mind, but for clarity please either
a) drop soc@...nel.org from Cc for patches that are meant for review
and will be part of a pull request.
or
b) put soc@...nel.org in the 'to:' field after they have been reviewed
and you want them to get merged.
Or even better, add an explicit sentence below the '---' line asking
for the patches to be merged directly into the soc tree when this
is what you want.
FWIW, I'd suggest merging the MAINTAINERS file change as a
bugfix for 5.15, it's generally better to do these as early as possible
to make sure any patches reach all the right people.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists