linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as MStar/Sigmastar Armv7 SoC maintainers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFr9PXkipBnVDBOpdYhUD4bYNaL8qybPhGJi7YwSHaCNrPz6rw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Sep 2021 00:04:44 +0900
From:   Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as MStar/Sigmastar Armv7 SoC maintainers

Hi Arnd,

On Tue, 14 Sept 2021 at 22:54, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> One process issue though: These emails were sent 'cc:soc@...nel.org', so
> they end up in patchwork, but I'm guessing they were not actually meant
> for us to apply from there. I'm happy to take merge these patches (or
> a future version of the series) directly from patchwork if that's what you
> both had in mind, but for clarity please either
>
> a) drop soc@...nel.org from Cc for patches that are meant for review
> and will be part of a pull request.
>
> or
>
> b) put soc@...nel.org in the 'to:' field after they have been reviewed
> and you want them to get merged.

Noted for the future. Until now we haven't done pull requests so
having the patches go into the soc patchwork made sense but from now
on we'll send pull requests when needed to you and Olof for the ARM
specific bits. Which I don't think there will be much aside from dts
stuff.

> Or even better, add an explicit sentence below the '---' line asking
> for the patches to be merged directly into the soc tree when this
> is what you want.

Noted.

> FWIW, I'd suggest merging the MAINTAINERS file change as a
> bugfix for 5.15, it's generally better to do these as early as possible
> to make sure any patches reach all the right people.

That makes sense.
Would it be possible for you to merge that single commit for me?
Seems like that would be easier than me creating a fixes branch for a
single commit, sending you a PR, finding out I still don't actually
know how to do PR properly.. :)
If it's a hassle I'll do the PR though.

Cheers,

Daniel