linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/20] futex: splitup and waitv syscall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f6b5514d-9ad8-59ae-6a86-c9fe5eb81895@collabora.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Sep 2021 15:24:27 -0300
From:   André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        bigeasy@...utronix.de, kernel@...labora.com, krisman@...labora.com,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        libc-alpha@...rceware.org, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
        dave@...olabs.net, arnd@...db.de, dvhart@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] futex: splitup and waitv syscall

Às 11:07 de 15/09/21, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> Hi,
> 
> Neither Thomas nor myself much liked that futex2.c nor do we think that CONFIG_
> symbol makes much sense.
> 
> However, futex.c is a wee bit long and splitting it up makes sense. So I've
> taken the liberty to replace your initial patch with 15 of my own and then
> rebased the remaining patches on top of that.
> 
> Thomas, does something like this work for you?
> 
I tested this patchset:

- On top of a full distro
- Using futex kselftests
- Running glibc's nptl tests, all 387 passed

It seems that things are working as expected. You can add my

	Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>

for patches 01 - 15.