linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Check whether clk_round

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 03:31:26 +0900
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:     linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Check whether
 clk_round_rate() returns zero rate

On 21. 9. 15. 오후 12:51, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 21. 9. 13. 오전 3:44, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> EMC clock is always-on and can't be zero. Check whether clk_round_rate()
>> returns zero rate and error out if it does. It can return zero if clock
>> tree isn't initialized properly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c 
>> b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>> index d83fdc2713ed..65ecf17a36f4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>> @@ -891,9 +891,9 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>           return err;
>>       rate = clk_round_rate(tegra->emc_clock, ULONG_MAX);
>> -    if (rate < 0) {
>> +    if (rate <= 0) {
>>           dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to round clock rate: %ld\n", rate);
>> -        return rate;
>> +        return rate ?: -EINVAL;

If rate is 0, It doesn't return and fall-through? even if print the 
error message. 'return rate ?: -EINVAL;' style is strange for me
because it doesn't specify the 'return value' when rate is true.


-- 
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi