[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210915065542.1897-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 08:55:40 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Duc Nguyen <duc.nguyen.ub@...esas.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: renesas-tpu: better errno for impossible rates
From: Duc Nguyen <duc.nguyen.ub@...esas.com>
ENOTSUP has confused users. EINVAL has been considered clearer. Change
the errno, we were the only ones using ENOTSUP in this subsystem anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Duc Nguyen <duc.nguyen.ub@...esas.com>
[wsa: split and reworded commit message]
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
index 4381df90a527..754440194650 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static int tpu_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *_pwm,
if (prescaler == ARRAY_SIZE(prescalers) || period == 0) {
dev_err(&tpu->pdev->dev, "clock rate mismatch\n");
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
if (duty_ns) {
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists