[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be4b0937-4f75-8d9f-90fb-95414c9d5a56@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:36:30 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Duc Nguyen <duc.nguyen.ub@...esas.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: renesas-tpu: better errno for impossible rates
On 15.09.2021 9:55, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Duc Nguyen <duc.nguyen.ub@...esas.com>
>
> ENOTSUP has confused users. EINVAL has been considered clearer. Change
> the errno, we were the only ones using ENOTSUP in this subsystem anyhow.
It's ENOTSUPP in the code. :-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Duc Nguyen <duc.nguyen.ub@...esas.com>
> [wsa: split and reworded commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
> index 4381df90a527..754440194650 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static int tpu_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *_pwm,
>
> if (prescaler == ARRAY_SIZE(prescalers) || period == 0) {
> dev_err(&tpu->pdev->dev, "clock rate mismatch\n");
> - return -ENOTSUPP;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> if (duty_ns) {
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists