[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXZcrjGAE5OOipKsYpEgk9AZ_hrWKh+v81FMBtQTBv2LA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:13:11 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] compiler.h: Introduce absolute_pointer macro
Hi Günter,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 5:52 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> absolute_pointer() disassociates a pointer from its originating symbol
> type and context. Use it to prevent compiler warnings/errors such as
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/i825xx/82596.c: In function 'i82596_probe':
> ./arch/m68k/include/asm/string.h:72:25: error:
> '__builtin_memcpy' reading 6 bytes from a region of size 0
> [-Werror=stringop-overread]
>
> Such warnings may be reported by gcc 11.x for string and memory operations
> on fixed addresses.
>
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> v2: No change
>
> include/linux/compiler.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
> index b67261a1e3e9..3d5af56337bd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
> @@ -188,6 +188,8 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, int val,
> (typeof(ptr)) (__ptr + (off)); })
> #endif
>
> +#define absolute_pointer(val) RELOC_HIDE((void *)(val), 0)
I guess we're not worried about "val" being evaluated multiple
times inside RELOC_HIDE(), as this is mainly intended for constants?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists