| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <faa9a9b7-919a-5b99-f99a-9550cc3d1260@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 00:59:35 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@...il.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: Ryu Euiyoul <ryu.real@...sung.com>, Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Implement pll0822x PLL type
On 21. 9. 15. 오전 12:56, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> pll0822x PLL is used in Exynos850 SoC for top-level integer PLLs. The
> code was derived from very similar pll35xx type, with next differences:
>
> 1. Lock time for pll0822x is 150*P_DIV, when for pll35xx it's 270*P_DIV
> 2. It's not suggested in Exynos850 TRM that S_DIV change doesn't require
> performing PLL lock procedure (which is done in pll35xx
> implementation)
>
> When defining pll0822x type, CON3 register offset should be provided as
> a "con" parameter of PLL() macro, like this:
>
> PLL(pll_0822x, 0, "fout_shared0_pll", "oscclk",
> PLL_LOCKTIME_PLL_SHARED0, PLL_CON3_PLL_SHARED0,
> exynos850_shared0_pll_rates),
>
> To define PLL rates table, one can use PLL_35XX_RATE() macro, e.g.:
>
> PLL_35XX_RATE(26 * MHZ, 1600 * MHZ, 800, 13, 0)
>
> as it's completely appropriate for pl0822x type and there is no sense in
> duplicating that.
>
> If bit #1 (MANUAL_PLL_CTRL) is not set in CON1 register, it won't be
> possible to set new rate, with next error showing in kernel log:
>
> Could not lock PLL fout_shared1_pll
>
> That can happen for example if bootloader clears that bit beforehand.
> PLL driver doesn't account for that, so if MANUAL_PLL_CTRL bit was
> cleared, it's assumed it was done for a reason and it shouldn't be
> possible to change that PLL's rate at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
> index 5873a9354b50..03131b149c0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
> @@ -415,6 +415,89 @@ static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll36xx_clk_min_ops = {
> .recalc_rate = samsung_pll36xx_recalc_rate,
> };
>
> +/*
> + * PLL0822x Clock Type
> + */
> +/* Maximum lock time can be 150 * PDIV cycles */
> +#define PLL0822X_LOCK_FACTOR (150)
> +
> +#define PLL0822X_MDIV_MASK (0x3FF)
> +#define PLL0822X_PDIV_MASK (0x3F)
> +#define PLL0822X_SDIV_MASK (0x7)
> +#define PLL0822X_MDIV_SHIFT (16)
> +#define PLL0822X_PDIV_SHIFT (8)
> +#define PLL0822X_SDIV_SHIFT (0)
> +#define PLL0822X_LOCK_STAT_SHIFT (29)
> +#define PLL0822X_ENABLE_SHIFT (31)
> +
> +static unsigned long samsung_pll0822x_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
> + u32 mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, pll_con3;
> + u64 fvco = parent_rate;
> +
> + pll_con3 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg);
> + mdiv = (pll_con3 >> PLL0822X_MDIV_SHIFT) & PLL0822X_MDIV_MASK;
> + pdiv = (pll_con3 >> PLL0822X_PDIV_SHIFT) & PLL0822X_PDIV_MASK;
> + sdiv = (pll_con3 >> PLL0822X_SDIV_SHIFT) & PLL0822X_SDIV_MASK;
> +
> + fvco *= mdiv;
> + do_div(fvco, (pdiv << sdiv));
> +
> + return (unsigned long)fvco;
> +}
> +
> +static int samsung_pll0822x_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate,
> + unsigned long prate)
> +{
> + const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate;
> + struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
> + u32 pll_con3;
> +
> + /* Get required rate settings from table */
> + rate = samsung_get_pll_settings(pll, drate);
> + if (!rate) {
> + pr_err("%s: Invalid rate : %lu for pll clk %s\n", __func__,
> + drate, clk_hw_get_name(hw));
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Change PLL PMS values */
> + pll_con3 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg);
> + pll_con3 &= ~((PLL0822X_MDIV_MASK << PLL0822X_MDIV_SHIFT) |
> + (PLL0822X_PDIV_MASK << PLL0822X_PDIV_SHIFT) |
> + (PLL0822X_SDIV_MASK << PLL0822X_SDIV_SHIFT));
> + pll_con3 |= (rate->mdiv << PLL0822X_MDIV_SHIFT) |
> + (rate->pdiv << PLL0822X_PDIV_SHIFT) |
> + (rate->sdiv << PLL0822X_SDIV_SHIFT);
> +
> + /* Set PLL lock time */
> + writel_relaxed(rate->pdiv * PLL0822X_LOCK_FACTOR,
> + pll->lock_reg);
> +
> + /* Write PMS values */
> + writel_relaxed(pll_con3, pll->con_reg);
> +
> + /* Wait for PLL lock if the PLL is enabled */
> + if (pll_con3 & BIT(pll->enable_offs))
> + return samsung_pll_lock_wait(pll, BIT(pll->lock_offs));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll0822x_clk_ops = {
> + .recalc_rate = samsung_pll0822x_recalc_rate,
> + .round_rate = samsung_pll_round_rate,
> + .set_rate = samsung_pll0822x_set_rate,
> + .enable = samsung_pll3xxx_enable,
> + .disable = samsung_pll3xxx_disable,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll0822x_clk_min_ops = {
> + .recalc_rate = samsung_pll0822x_recalc_rate,
> +};
> +
> /*
> * PLL45xx Clock Type
> */
> @@ -1296,6 +1379,14 @@ static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx,
> else
> init.ops = &samsung_pll35xx_clk_ops;
> break;
> + case pll_0822x:
> + pll->enable_offs = PLL0822X_ENABLE_SHIFT;
> + pll->lock_offs = PLL0822X_LOCK_STAT_SHIFT;
> + if (!pll->rate_table)
> + init.ops = &samsung_pll0822x_clk_min_ops;
> + else
> + init.ops = &samsung_pll0822x_clk_ops;
> + break;
> case pll_4500:
> init.ops = &samsung_pll45xx_clk_min_ops;
> break;
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
> index 79e41c226b90..213e94a97f23 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ enum samsung_pll_type {
> pll_1451x,
> pll_1452x,
> pll_1460x,
> + pll_0822x,
> };
>
> #define PLL_RATE(_fin, _m, _p, _s, _k, _ks) \
>
Even if I have not Exynos850 TRM, it looks good to me. Thanks.
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
--
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists