linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.13 310/380] selftests/bpf: Enlarge select() timeout for test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210916155814.612419626@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:01:07 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...fujitsu.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.13 310/380] selftests/bpf: Enlarge select() timeout for test_maps

From: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...fujitsu.com>

[ Upstream commit 2d82d73da35b72b53fe0d96350a2b8d929d07e42 ]

0Day robot observed that it's easily timeout on a heavy load host.
-------------------
 # selftests: bpf: test_maps
 # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
 # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
 # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
 # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
 # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
 # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
 # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
 # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
 # Failed sockmap unexpected timeout
 not ok 3 selftests: bpf: test_maps # exit=1
 # selftests: bpf: test_lru_map
 # nr_cpus:8
-------------------
Since this test will be scheduled by 0Day to a random host that could have
only a few cpus(2-8), enlarge the timeout to avoid a false NG report.

In practice, i tried to pin it to only one cpu by 'taskset 0x01 ./test_maps',
and knew 10S is likely enough, but i still perfer to a larger value 30.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210820015556.23276-2-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index aa38dc4a5e85..90f38c6528a1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
 
 		FD_ZERO(&w);
 		FD_SET(sfd[3], &w);
-		to.tv_sec = 1;
+		to.tv_sec = 30;
 		to.tv_usec = 0;
 		s = select(sfd[3] + 1, &w, NULL, NULL, &to);
 		if (s == -1) {
-- 
2.30.2