linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.13 311/380] mmc: core: Return correct emmc response in case of ioctl error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210916155814.643254566@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:01:08 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@...il.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.13 311/380] mmc: core: Return correct emmc response in case of ioctl error

From: Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit e72a55f2e5ddcfb3dce0701caf925ce435b87682 ]

When a read/write command is sent via ioctl to the kernel,
and the command fails, the actual error response of the emmc
is not sent to the user.

IOCTL read/write tests are carried out using commands
17 (Single BLock Read), 24 (Single Block Write),
18 (Multi Block Read), 25 (Multi Block Write)

The tests are carried out on a 64Gb emmc device. All of these
tests try to access an "out of range" sector address (0x09B2FFFF).

It is seen that without the patch the response received by the user
is not OUT_OF_RANGE error (R1 response 31st bit is not set) as per
JEDEC specification. After applying the patch proper response is seen.
This is because the function returns without copying the response to
the user in case of failure. This patch fixes the issue.

Hence, this memcpy is required whether we get an error response or not.
Therefor it is moved up from the current position up to immediately
after we have called mmc_wait_for_req().

The test code and the output of only the CMD17 is included in the
commit to limit the message length.

CMD17 (Test Code Snippet):
==========================
        printf("Forming CMD%d\n", opt_idx);
        /*  single block read */
        cmd.blksz = 512;
        cmd.blocks = 1;
        cmd.write_flag = 0;
        cmd.opcode = 17;
        //cmd.arg = atoi(argv[3]);
        cmd.arg = 0x09B2FFFF;
        /* Expecting response R1B */
        cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC;

        memset(data, 0, sizeof(__u8) * 512);
        mmc_ioc_cmd_set_data(cmd, data);

        printf("Sending CMD%d: ARG[0x%08x]\n", opt_idx, cmd.arg);
        if(ioctl(fd, MMC_IOC_CMD, &cmd))
                perror("Error");

        printf("\nResponse: %08x\n", cmd.response[0]);

CMD17 (Output without patch):
=============================
test@...t-LIVA-Z:~$ sudo ./mmc cmd_test /dev/mmcblk0 17
Entering the do_mmc_commands:Device: /dev/mmcblk0 nargs:4
Entering the do_mmc_commands:Device: /dev/mmcblk0 options[17, 0x09B2FFF]
Forming CMD17
Sending CMD17: ARG[0x09b2ffff]
Error: Connection timed out

Response: 00000000
(Incorrect response)

CMD17 (Output with patch):
==========================
test@...t-LIVA-Z:~$ sudo ./mmc cmd_test /dev/mmcblk0 17
[sudo] password for test:
Entering the do_mmc_commands:Device: /dev/mmcblk0 nargs:4
Entering the do_mmc_commands:Device: /dev/mmcblk0 options[17, 09B2FFFF]
Forming CMD17
Sending CMD17: ARG[0x09b2ffff]
Error: Connection timed out

Response: 80000900
(Correct OUT_OF_ERROR response as per JEDEC specification)

Signed-off-by: Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210824191726.8296-1-nishadkamdar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
index 2518bc085659..d47829b9fc0f 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
@@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ static int __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_blk_data *md,
 		return mmc_sanitize(card, idata->ic.cmd_timeout_ms);
 
 	mmc_wait_for_req(card->host, &mrq);
+	memcpy(&idata->ic.response, cmd.resp, sizeof(cmd.resp));
 
 	if (cmd.error) {
 		dev_err(mmc_dev(card->host), "%s: cmd error %d\n",
@@ -591,8 +592,6 @@ static int __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_blk_data *md,
 	if (idata->ic.postsleep_min_us)
 		usleep_range(idata->ic.postsleep_min_us, idata->ic.postsleep_max_us);
 
-	memcpy(&(idata->ic.response), cmd.resp, sizeof(cmd.resp));
-
 	if (idata->rpmb || (cmd.flags & MMC_RSP_R1B) == MMC_RSP_R1B) {
 		/*
 		 * Ensure RPMB/R1B command has completed by polling CMD13
-- 
2.30.2