[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1A7A8472-1AAA-4F51-A9CF-08BF1837F9EB@aspeedtech.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 01:12:13 +0000
From: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>
To: "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
"lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
"pmeerw@...erw.net" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"joel@....id.au" <joel@....id.au>,
"andrew@...id.au" <andrew@...id.au>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: BMC-SW <BMC-SW@...eedtech.com>
Subject: Re: [v6 07/11] iio: adc: aspeed: Fix the calculate error of clock.
On 2021/9/13, 3:51 PM, "Billy Tsai" <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com> wrote:
> The ADC clock formula is
> ast2400/2500:
> ADC clock period = PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[31:17] + 1) * (ADC0C[9:0] + 1)
> ast2600:
> ADC clock period = PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[15:0] + 1)
> They all have one fixed divided 2 and the legacy driver didn't handle it.
> This patch register the fixed factory clock device as the parent of ADC
> clock scaler to fix this issue.
> Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c
> index 3ec4e1a2ddd3..262b5f80c728 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,12 @@
> *
> * Copyright (C) 2017 Google, Inc.
> * Copyright (C) 2021 Aspeed Technology Inc.
> + *
> + * ADC clock formula:
> + * Ast2400/Ast2500:
> + * clock period = period of PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[31:17] + 1) * (ADC0C[9:0] + 1)
> + * Ast2600:
> + * clock period = period of PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[15:0] + 1)
> */
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> @@ -85,6 +91,7 @@ struct aspeed_adc_data {
> struct regulator *regulator;
> void __iomem *base;
> spinlock_t clk_lock;
> + struct clk_hw *fixed_div_clk;
> struct clk_hw *clk_prescaler;
> struct clk_hw *clk_scaler;
> struct reset_control *rst;
> @@ -197,6 +204,13 @@ static const struct iio_info aspeed_adc_iio_info = {
> .debugfs_reg_access = aspeed_adc_reg_access,
> };
> +static void aspeed_adc_unregister_fixed_divider(void *data)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *clk = data;
> +
> + clk_hw_unregister_fixed_factor(clk);
> +}
> +
> static void aspeed_adc_reset_assert(void *data)
> {
> struct reset_control *rst = data;
> @@ -321,6 +335,19 @@ static int aspeed_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> spin_lock_init(&data->clk_lock);
> snprintf(clk_parent_name, ARRAY_SIZE(clk_parent_name), "%s",
> of_clk_get_parent_name(pdev->dev.of_node, 0));
> + snprintf(clk_name, ARRAY_SIZE(clk_name), "%s-fixed-div",
> + data->model_data->model_name);
> + data->fixed_div_clk = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(
> + &pdev->dev, clk_name, clk_parent_name, 0, 1, 2);
> + if (IS_ERR(data->fixed_div_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(data->fixed_div_clk);
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(data->dev,
> + aspeed_adc_unregister_fixed_divider,
> + data->clk_prescaler);
I found that the parameter aspeed_adc_unregister_fixed_divider is wrong.
I will send patch v7 after the other patches are reviewed.
Thanks
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + snprintf(clk_parent_name, ARRAY_SIZE(clk_parent_name), clk_name);
> if (data->model_data->need_prescaler) {
> snprintf(clk_name, ARRAY_SIZE(clk_name), "%s-prescaler",
> --
> 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists