[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGuE1y7ZdOE+=N1v7Zc=gigopS50BaADHpUOoM2TrshSCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:42:05 -0700
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add NO_CONNECTOR support
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 3:20 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 3:53 PM Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> >
> > Slightly awkward to fish out the display_info when we aren't creating
> > own connector. But I don't see an obvious better way.
> >
> > v2: Remove error return with NO_CONNECTOR flag
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> This seems fine to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>
> ...if you would like me to apply patch #2 / #3 to drm-misc-next then
> please yell.
Thanks.. I think we can give it a few days for Laurent to have a look.
This will conflict some with Maxime's bridge vs dsi-host ordering
series.. not sure how close that one is to the finish line, but I can
rebase either patch on top of the other depending on which order they
are applied
BR,
-R
Powered by blists - more mailing lists