[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUuJo7IfS4x0iLfX@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:53:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
Balbir Singh <sblbir@...zon.com>,
Chris Hyser <chris.hyser@...cle.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@....com.cn>,
Xiaofeng Cao <caoxiaofeng@...ong.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Thomas Cedeno <thomascedeno@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: introduce prctl(PR_LOG_UACCESS)
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 03:22:50PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 19:46:47 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > > All signals except SIGKILL and SIGSTOP are masked for the interval
> > > between the prctl() and the next syscall in order to prevent handlers
> > > for intervening asynchronous signals from issuing syscalls that may
> > > cause uaccesses from the wrong syscall to be logged.
> >
> > Stupid question: can this be exploited from user space to effectively
> > disable SIGKILL for a long time ... and do we care?
>
> I first misread it too, but then caught my mistake reading it a second
> time. It says "except SIGKILL". So no, it does not disable SIGKILL.
Disabling SIGINT might already be a giant nuisance. Letting through
SIGSTOP but not SIGCONT seems awkward. Blocking SIGTRAP seems like a bad
idea too. Blocking SIGBUS as delivered by #MC will be hillarious.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists